Randy McDonald ([info]rfmcdpei) wrote,
@ 2006-02-28 14:52:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:faintly sick
Current music:Jean-Michel Jarre, "Hey Gagarin"
Entry tags:book reviews, eugenics, genocide, heather pringle, nazism

[REVIEW] Heather Pringle, The Master Plan
Heather Pringle's 2006 The Master Plan: Himmler's Scholars and the Holocaust is the sort of book that makes one want to laugh in horror. Pringle's pleasant if conventional journalistic style does nothing at all to disguise the horror that she feels on discovering the full extent of the activities of the Ahnenerbe, the SS' occult research ministry. Starting off from the theosophy and kindred New Age movements which were popular in early 20th century Germany, Pringle demonstrates convincingly that the Ahnenerbe went on to take these theories, rooted in beliefs of deeply-hidden conspiracies and long-forgotten similarities and secret bloodlines, and make them the central justifications for major Nazi goals including the Holocaust and the planned colonization of central and eastern Europe.

The intellectual speciousness of the Ahnenerbe's arguments--arguing by deduction and by inference whenever it pleased them, or simply making up theories wholesale like (say) an ancient populous Gothic empire in Crimea--is astounding. It's difficult to believe that a modern state was willing to support research institutions which claimed, among other things, that Germans were the last pure descendants of Aryan Atlantis, that Tiahaunaco in South America was an ancient German city, and that the entire universe was made out of ice and that we were on our seventh Moon, the previous six having crashed into the Earth and melted into the oceans. But then, when I read translated memoranda which happily say that, with Operation Barbarossa, Nazi phrenologists will be at last able to overcome the shortage of Jewish skulls that bedevilled them, and how some researchers hoped to use human sacrifice to tap ancient mystic energies for great weapons like Thor's lightning bolts, I stopped disbelieving. Among other things, it turns out that the Nazis were criminally stupid and credulous besides being prototypical pulp science-fiction villains. That, and the willingness to use any specious reasoning and no specious reasoning at all, explains their entire ideology.

The Master Plan deserves to be widely read. It astonishes me that more hasn't been generally known of the Ahnenerbe. One reason why that story hasn't resonated before now might, perhaps, lie in the prevalence of all those same root sources of Nazi ideology in our own culture, in the popularity of books like The Da Vinci Code which purport to explain the modern world as product of vast ancient conspiracies and in the revolts against reason and science and rational behaviour. Often there's even a direct link between the 1920s and our time, as in Graham Hancock's writings. Can you see a potential problem here, too?



(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2006-02-28 08:11 pm UTC (link)
You want to be careful in believing too much of this. Sure, there were so real nut jobs among the Nazis but, as a whole, the Nazis weren't stupid. If they really were mere Hogan's Heroes caricatures, they wouldn't have come so damn close to winning WWII.

Alexander

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-02-28 10:20 pm UTC (link)
Alexander,

practical intelligence != intellectual soundness. The Nazis by and large knew how to get things done, they just had disastrous ideas *what* to do.

I've read elsewhere about these activities. There are a few pages in Fest's Hitler biography, IIRC, and a chapter on the "Welteislehre" (the theory claiming most celestial bodies, including the moon, consist of ice) in my German copy of Willy Ley's "Watchers". So there are at least some supporting other sources for Pringle's book.

Dagmar

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2006-03-01 10:28 pm UTC (link)
practical intelligence != intellectual soundness. The Nazis by and large knew how to get things done, they just had disastrous ideas *what* to do.

I certainly don't have the slightest disagreement with the above. However, as much as the current trend is to trivialize them into some sort of dysfunctional and evil New Agers, they were far more practical than that. Cranks? Yes. But, ruthlessly efficient cranks.

Alexander

(Reply to this)(Parent)

I'm With You 100%
pimpsophist
2006-02-28 09:48 pm UTC (link)
I'm very happy that someone finally decided to cover this side of the Nazis. The mixture of totalitarianism and science is never healthy and Pringle's book is just one example of that. Paleoanthropology in China is still to this day at times manipulated or at least pressured by the nationalist government into supporting an ancient origin for the Chinese. Homo erectus is presented as a fully developed human with complete mastery of tool making and even fire. I read about Pringle's new book in the latest issue of Archaeology a few days ago and quickly ordered the book online. It came today and I'm already several chapters into it.

I'm reminded of "Ecofascism" by Janet Biehl and Peter Staudenmaier and the way they show how ecology was similarly warped and manipulated by the Nazis to justify their agenda. The whole "Blood and Soil" theme. I'm not surprised at all that the Nazis could hold these views and still be dangerously intelligent in planning and carrying out the war effort. The current American regime can maintain faith in ideas ranging from creationism to the coming apocalypse and the lack of global warming and still manage to cause a danger.

As you mention Graham Hancock and the vast diversity of ancient conspiracy theories I'd also throw out the suggestion to look into Jason Colavito's "The Cult of Alien Gods: H. P. Lovecraft and Extraterrestrial Pop Culture." The author's goal in the book, which I haven't read and can't fully assess yet, is to lay out the case that Lovecraft developed the idea that aliens were the early gods that helped created human civilization and that only later people like Hancock and others seemed to have picked up the ideas in a serious fashion. Apparently he ends the book with a discussion of how concerned he is that our modern culture is taking seriously ideas that were originally fictional and have little to no evidence for them. It is as if we wanted to believe in conspiracies.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: I'm With You 100%
(Anonymous)
2006-03-01 10:33 pm UTC (link)
The current American regime can maintain faith in ideas ranging from creationism to the coming apocalypse and the lack of global warming

More disturbingly, it can reject evolution, but still think that we need to invest money in case bird flu "develops" the ability to infect humans. That takes a staggering leap of faith!

Alexander

(Reply to this)(Parent)

The prevalence of faddists in political life
(Anonymous)
2006-02-28 11:07 pm UTC (link)
"One reason why that story hasn't resonated before now might, perhaps, lie in the prevalence of all those same root sources of Nazi ideology in our own culture, [...] Can you see a potential problem here, too?"

Possibly, but not likely. There were cultural undercurrents of faddism before the Nazis and there doubtless exist some today --- just look at the health food section of any book store. But as far as I'm aware most of today's scientific cranks aren't collectivists. They offer weird receipes for the maintenance of individual, not racial or otherwise collective, health, and that makes them a lot of less dangerous.

There is a parallel to the period covered by Pringle, though: What happened with the Ahnenerbe was that first people with little scientific (or any) education got access to information channels during the last years of the Kaiserreich and even more during the 20ies, and this situation enabled a lot of cranks to acquire some following. And then after 1933, there was suddenly government money and an official platform available for these types provided they weren't Jewish and their theories could somehow be exploited for the political ends of the government.

Today? With the rise of the internet over the last 10 or 15 years we do have the increased access to information channels for the masses. But most current pseudoscientific fads I'm aware of are older than that. The dangerous ideas of today are mostly directly religious, without the detour via science. And as for politicians giving credence and possibly money to them, we don't have to look very far.

Dagmar

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…