Randy McDonald ([info]rfmcdpei) wrote,
@ 2009-07-03 19:20:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:clash of ideologies, iran, middle east, politics

[BRIEF NOTE] My take on Iran?
This post will be fairly superficial, informed by only three Asia Times articles, but what the hell? The only thing that I can say for certain is that the Islamic Republic is currently stifling the people of Iran and that a new regime woujld be wonderful, but how likely is that?


  • Pepe Escobar ("Iran's streets are lost, but hopes remain") suggests that the opposition to Ahmadinejad and the religious oligarchy isn't a thing only of the young, but rather includes conservatives and business classes upset by recent economic mismanagement, potentially creating a broad coalition aimed against the Islamic Republic as currently constituted.

  • Shahir Shahidsaless' "Miscalculations abound in Iran" also argues that the recent election helped created a broad coalition against the established order, but argues that even if the lowest possible number of Ahmadinejad voters that's still a huge number of people opposed to the anti-government coalition. Culture--and political--wars are ungoing.

  • Kaveh L Afrasiabi's "Crunching the numbers" takes a critical look at the criticisms of the election as fraudulent, arguing that many of the claims made by the anti-Ahmadinejad coalition might be inaccurate, and that their nemesis might have won fairly.



So what will happen? If the military remains under the control of the established order, there won't be a revolution now or for some time to come. Maybe there will be a gradual softening; maybe there will be a sharp shock. Who knows? I'd just hope that it would come quickly, for everyone's sake. A stable, prosperous, and hopefully secularizing Iran would be a much better policeman of the Persian Gulf than Saudi Arabia, I'd like to believe.



(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]absinthe_dot_ca
2009-07-04 12:24 am UTC (link)
It's interesting that Kaveh Afrasiabi's article says that the results of the Iranian election appear to be statistically valid, given that I posted a link to another article a few days ago which argued (and used actual numbers, rather than hand-waving) that the odds of the results being valid were approximately 1 in 200. I have to wonder how you can consider that many districts somehow recorded more than 100% voter participation, but then say that the results of the election are legitimate. Questionable, at best, IMHO.

(Reply to this)


[info]dubaiwalla
2009-07-04 05:59 am UTC (link)
A stable, prosperous, and hopefully secularizing Iran would be a much better policeman of the Persian Gulf than Saudi Arabia, I'd like to believe.
The policeman of the Gulf is currently the United States, not Saudi Arabia.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]rfmcdpei
2009-07-04 04:32 pm UTC (link)
Indigenous power, then.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…