A Bit More Detail

> recent entries
> calendar
> friends
> My Website
> profile

Advertisement

Tuesday, December 6th, 2005
8:58a - [LINK] Edwards Magazine
I'm pleased to note that the website of [info]london_calling's new women's-issues magazine, Edwards Magazine, is online.

(2 comments |comment on this)

2:35p - [QUIZ] How good have I been?
Via [info]nwhyte.

I hope fluffcthulhu is pleased. )

(5 comments |comment on this)

2:41p - [META] Two Notes

  • In my note about Edwards Magazine, I forgot to include [info]tudor_rose with [info]london_calling as an editor. My apologies.

  • Just as a note, could I ask my commenters to try to avoid personal attacks, for the sake of polite, friendly, and engaging discourse? Yes, if I myself slip feel entirely free to come down upon me.

(3 comments |comment on this)

2:59p - [BRIEF NOTE] An Anniversary Note
Today is the 16th anniversary of the Montreal Massacre, in which 14 women students at the École Polytechnique were systematically killed and 13 other students wounded by a lone gunman. This massacre was a signal event in Canadian gender relations, demonstrating too vividly the ultimate consequences of misogyny and showing the need for a critical examination of gender relations in Canada today.

Peter Schneider's New York Times Magazine article "The New Berlin Wall" describes a comparable event.

On the night of Feb. 7, 2005, Hatun Surucu, 23, was killed on her way to a bus stop in Berlin-Tempelhof by several shots to the head and upper body, fired at point-blank range. The investigation revealed that months before, she reported one of her brothers to the police for threatening her. Now three of her five brothers are on trial for murder. According to the prosecutor, the oldest of them (25) acquired the weapon, the middle brother (24) lured his sister to the scene of the crime and the youngest (18) shot her. The trial began on Sept. 21. Ayhan Surucu, the youngest brother, had confessed to the murder and claimed that he had done it without any help. According to Seyran Ates, a lawyer of Turkish descent, it is generally the youngest who are chosen by the family council to carry out such murders - or to claim responsibility for them. German juvenile law sets a maximum sentence of 10 years' imprisonment for murder, and the offender has the prospect of being released after serving two-thirds of the sentence.

Hatun Surucu grew up in Berlin as the daughter of Turkish Kurds. When she finished eighth grade, her parents took her out of school. Shortly after that she was taken to Turkey and married to a cousin. Later she separated from her husband and returned to Berlin, pregnant. At age 17 she gave birth to a son, Can. She moved into a women's shelter and completed the work for her middle-school certificate. By 2004 she had finished a vocational-training program to become an electrician. The young mother who had escaped her family's constraints began to enjoy herself. She put on makeup, wore her hair unbound, went dancing and adorned herself with rings, necklaces and bracelets. Then, just days before she was to receive her journeyman's diploma, her life was cut short.

Evidently, in the eyes of her brothers, Hatun Surucu's capital crime was that, living in Germany, she had begun living like a German. In a statement to the Turkish newspaper Zaman, one brother noted that she had stopped wearing her head scarf, that she refused to go back to her family and that she had declared her intent to "seek out her own circle of friends." It's still unclear whether anyone ordered her murdered. Often in such cases it is the father of the family who decides about the punishment. But Seyran Ates has seen in her legal practice cases in which the mother has a leading role: mothers who were forced to marry forcing the same fate on their daughters. Necla Kelek, a Turkish-German author who has interviewed dozens of women on this topic, explained, "The mothers are looking for solidarity by demanding that their daughters submit to the same hardship and suffering." By disobeying them, the daughter calls into question her mother's life - her silent submission to the ritual of forced marriage. Meanwhile, the two elder brothers have papered their cell with pictures of their dead sister.


Arguments from tradition--religious traditions, cultural traditions more broadly--about proper standards on gender, on sexuality, on interpersonal relations, on exogamy, have a worrying tendency to end badly indeed. It stems from a basic insecurity, from a realization that traditional patterns really are inherently unstable and that--given a choice--people will opt out of them freely. How to deal with this? Unmistakably vivid and direct violence. Structural misogyny in conservative immigrant communities is a difficult one to treat without risking feeding xenophobic trends. Suffice it to say that, as [info]autopope noted earlier, the legal status of women in the liberal England of the late 19th century was comparable to that of women under the Taliban in 2001, and that if any human-rights movement claims to be anti-racist it can't make patronizing claims that members of the Other must be excepted from the standards we demand of ourselves. It's somewhat like the ritualized killings of gays that are unfortunately so common in the Muslim world, partly influenced by structural homophobia in the colonizing West, mostly influenced by people claiming Islamic legitimacy: It may have deep roots in another culture's traditions, true, but as explanatory as this is it certainly isn't an excuse.

No one deserves to fear death because of their individuality, regardless of their background. Here's hoping that the spirit of the Montreal Massacre will fade out everywhere, quickly not slowly.


current mood: polemical

(2 comments |comment on this)

5:48p - [BRIEF NOTE] Why I'm very tempted to think that the invasion of Iraq, however bungled, was necessary
From The Globe and Mail:

The witness said she was 16 at the time of the Dujail incident. She broke down and cried several times during her testimony, strongly suggesting that she had been raped although she did not say so outright.

When the judge later asked her about the “assault,” she said “I was beaten up and tortured by electrical shocks.”

However, she repeated that she had been ordered to undress.

“I begged them, but they hit with their pistols,” she said. “They made me put my legs up. There were five or more and they treated me like a banquet. Is that what happens to the virtuous woman that Saddam speaks about?”

The judge then advised her to stick to the facts.

She said she was thrown into a room with red walls and ceiling in an intelligence department building and that prisoners were given only bread and water to eat.

“I could not even eat because of the torture,” she said.

She said prisoners were later moved to Abu Ghraib prison where the torture continued.


This, to someone who simply lived in the same village as the attempted assassins; this, in only one village.


current mood: sick

(13 comments |comment on this)

6:12p - [BRIEF NOTE] The problem with excluding gay priests
I haven't commented on the Catholic Church's banning of non-heterosexual men from the priesthood since, to be honest, I don't have enough of a relationship with the Catholic Church to be particularly shocked by this latest sign of the institution's homophobia. I tend to agree with Jason Kuznicki at Positive Liberty that as unfair as this may be, it does seem to be consistent with the internal logics of the Church. I'm sorry.

It's a matter of public record that a high proportion of priests are gay. Although the precise figures vary, it seems safe to say that the proportion of gay priests is well in excess of the ~3% of the male population that's predominantly gay. Commentators like Richard John Neuhaus, editor of the conservative monthly First Things, have welcomed this, Neuhaus suggesting on his blog that eliminating gay priests will encourage straights to enter the priesthood.

Will the instruction result in a collapse of priestly vocations? Only if you believe vocations depend upon the three percent of the male population that identifies itself as gay or is afflicted with strong or exclusive same-sex attraction. The instruction will, I expect, make the priesthood more attractive to those who are in the other 97 percent of men and who discern a call to the priesthood, which includes the admittedly difficult discipline of chaste celibacy.


What Neuhaus and his peers don't seem to recognize is the possibility that the Catholic priesthood has always attracted a disproportionately large number of non-heterosexuals, simply because the Catholic priesthood's requirements of celibacy would be very attractive to someone looking for an excuse not to follow traditional patterns of heterosexual matrimony. "I'm not getting married, why would I? I'm doing God's work." If it was possible for these potential applicants to lead fulfilling lives regardless of the fact that they weren't straight, the priesthood's attractiveness to gays would diminish, as it in fact has. If it was made impossible for anyone who wasn't heterosexual to adopt a clerical vocation, then they won't. In an era when one of the leading problems of the Catholic Church is its inability to attract new priests, this generic ban on a major segment of incoming applicants could prove crippling. Might it not be fitting, too?


current mood: unsurprised

(9 comments |comment on this)


<< previous day [calendar] next day >>

> top of page
LiveJournal.com