Thursday, May 8th, 2008

[LINK] "France salutes the 'almost Queen of Canada'"

From The Globe and Mail, coverage of the visit of Canadian Governor-General Michaëlle Jean to France:

In her first state visit to France, Governor-General Michaëlle Jean has been extolled in the media as the "almost Queen of Canada" and a symbol of successful multiculturalism - and all in this decidedly anti-monarchist country where immigration is widely seen as a problem.

"I perceive my role as a kind of catalyst," she said in an interview yesterday. "And I find myself in that role here."

Ms. Jean met with French President Nicolas Sarkozy and is scheduled to join him again today in Normandy for memorial services marking the anniversary of the Second World War armistice in Europe. They are also to visit a Canadian military cemetery.

In interviews with the French press, Ms. Jean said one of her aims is to impress upon French officials that French-speaking Canada extends well beyond Quebec. While her comments were welcomed in Paris as confirmation of the health of what the French call the francophonie, they prompted indignation from the Bloc Québécois. Pierre Paquette, the Bloc's deputy leader, called Ms. Jean's statements an insult to Quebeckers.

The other theme to Ms. Jean's visit was the 400th anniversary celebrations of the founding of Quebec City. She will spend half a day in La Rochelle, the port city that was the embarkation point for Samuel Champlain, founder of Quebec, and for later French settlers sailing for Canada in the 17th and 18th centuries.

[. . . T]he French government has signalled a possible policy shift away from official neutrality on the issue of Quebec sovereignty.

Last month, Alain Joyandet, the French minister in charge of relations with francophone countries, said France considered the political question of separatism to be a "non-issue." But he also said Mr. Sarkozy favoured a "direct and privileged" relationship with the province that could include special agreements on trade and labour exchanges.

Ms. Jean's five-day state visit ends on Saturday with another ceremony in Bordeaux, once a thriving port for the African slave trade, where she will join French government ministers to commemorate France's abolition of slavery 160 years ago.

One of her public themes for her visit is what she called "the duty of memory." As the great-great-granddaughter of slaves, she said the Bordeaux leg of the trip would be a particularly personal undertaking.

"I know it's going to be a deeply emotional experience for me to be there on the docks in Bordeaux," she said, "there where at least one of my ancestors was probably selected for transfer ... and where slaves were loaded onboard the boats like cargo."
(4 comments | Leave a comment)

Monday, March 17th, 2008

[LINK] "Lazare Ponticelli, France’s Last Veteran of World War I, Is Dead at 110"

Via The New York Times, Douglas Martin's article "Lazare Ponticelli, France’s Last Veteran of World War I, Is Dead at 110".

Lazare Ponticelli, who outlived more than 8.4 million other soldiers who fought under the French flag in World War I to become France’s last living veteran of the war intended to end all wars, died Wednesday at his home in Kremlin-Bicêtre, a Paris suburb. He was 110.

Fewer than two dozen World War I veterans are thought to be alive. Six have died this year, including the last German veteran and the next-to-last French one.

Survival in itself is not necessarily an achievement, and Mr. Ponticelli said in an interview with Reuters last year that he “never knew how I got to this point.”

He was always emphatic that the glory belonged to the more than 1.3 million French soldiers who were killed. Last week Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates honored the war’s survivors, including the last American veteran to serve overseas, Frank Buckles, 107.

By contrast, the German government paid no attention to the death on Jan. 1 of its last veteran, Erich Kästner.

When Jacques Chirac was president of France, he vowed to honor the last veteran with a state funeral, but Mr. Ponticelli fought the idea, saying it would be an insult to all the men who died without commemoration.

But after the death in January of the only other French veteran of the war, Louis de Cazenave, also 110, Mr. Ponticelli agreed to a smaller ceremony to honor all veterans. “No racket, no procession,” he specified.

Lazare Ponticelli was born on Dec. 7, 1897, near the northern Italian village of Bettola. Poverty drove him to leave the village alone to go to France, which he considered “paradise,” according to Agence France-Presse.

He worked in Paris as a chimney sweep and paper boy, and in 1914 he lied about his age to join the French Foreign Legion. He was the last veteran of the legion to have fought in World War I.

He was soon at the front line in the forest of Argonne, where the French were hampered by not having trenches. The Germans did. He also fought at Verdun. Reuters reported that he once rescued a wounded German and a wounded French soldier caught between the front lines.

At an Armistice Day ceremony last year, he said he had only one thought during combat: “We’re all going to die.”

When Italy entered the war in 1915, Mr. Ponticelli was drafted into the Italian Army and fought against the Austrians in Tyrol, where he was wounded in the face.

He returned to France after the war and started a piping company with two of his brothers, which now employs 4,000 people, Agence France-Presse reported. He became a French citizen in 1939.

[. . .]

Mr. Ponticelli’s view of war was dispirited. “You shoot at men who are fathers,” he once said, according to an obituary by Reuters. “War is completely stupid.” He kept his many war medals in a shoe box.
(2 comments | Leave a comment)

Thursday, March 13th, 2008

[LINK] "From Francafrique to Eurafrique with Sarkozy: Not Much of a Difference?"

I'm normally skeptical of the motivations of Turkish sources critical of France ever since Franco-Turkish relations broke down after France's recognition of the Armenian genocide earlier this decade, but Caglar Dolek's quite readable "From Francafrique to Eurafrique with Sarkozy: Not Much of a Difference?", published in the Journal of Turkish Weekly, does make good points about Sarkozy's Mediterranean Union plan. Dolek argues that, via the European Union, France is trying to move on from the nominally and cronyishpost-colonial web of ecionomic, political and military contacts known as "Francafrique" by bringing in the entire European Union into a much closer relationship the entire African continent, not only the Francophone countries.

After reading Nicholas Shaxson's Poisoned Wells, I'm quite willing to agree with Dolek that French motivations are far from pure and that this would add quite a few negatives, like substantial corruption and seret networks of powerful people, to the broader European political arena.. I also think that the realization of something like this plan is inevitable, if only because of the potential economic synergy between the two shores of the Mediterranean. At least the North African states like Morocco and Tunisia that have a passing chance of joining the European Union have a chance at avoiding the worst of this arrangement.
(3 comments | Leave a comment)

Wednesday, March 12th, 2008

[BRIEF NOTE] The desperate emigrants of Senegal

A while ago, I came across an article originally from Agence France-Presse that explored the mechanics of illegal emigration from Senegal. It makes for compelling reading.

Because of the clandestine nature of the business, it is not known how many migrants are processed or how many fishing boats set sail from Elinkine, nestled in the deep mangroves on the mouth of the Casamance River, in Senegal's southern province of the same name.

But what is certain is that it is a key departure point for west African illegal emigrants trying to cross the Atlantic Ocean to the so-called European Eldorado and that a network of smugglers are raking a fortune from the trade.

"Here everybody benefits, that is why people are careful," says Alioune who identifies himself by a pseudonym.

Residents of this tiny, leafy village are very cagey when it comes to talking about the booming trade that has prospered in recent years, from desperately poor Africans who exhaust their family's meagre resources for the risky 1,000-plus kilometre-long (625-plus miles) trip on high seas in ramshackle fishing boats.

When and if they talk, they neither give their full names nor details for fear of upsetting the system.

Boat owners and smugglers are directly involved in the trafficking, as are fishermen enlisted to sail the pirogues.

Along a sandy village street, a ferryman sitting on his veranda who gives his name as Joseph says that he is aware that he is on a police wanted list.

"We can make lots of money, but a lot of smugglers have been arrested," he said before dodging away.

According to Alioune, an average two boats set sail from Elinkine aiming for the Spanish Canary Islands every week, but it is generally not a subject of open discussion because "it is a very dangerous game" that concerns the entire village.

Some homes around the village serve as "lodges" where days before takeoff, the prospective migrants are gathered and prepared for the trip.

"Everybody is well aware and most of the people are involved. It comes with lots of money, it's a mafia here," added Alioune. Boats owners have created what he called a commission that "facilitates" the departures, he said.

Each boat owner contributes an annual fee to this commission of three million CFA francs (4,500 euros, 6,600 dollars) "and in return the departures are facilitated and the police get their share," he said.


Senegal is an African country that has been profoundly influenced by Europe. In the modern era, France's Senegalese colony was transformed by the 1848 revolution in France, which abandoned slavery and made inhabitants of the city of Dakar French citizens. Dakar remained a regional capital during the period of French empire in Africa. By the First World War, as Barbara Jettinger's Senegal country study (PDF format) points out, many Senegalese were heading to the metropole.

The first wave of out-migration to Europe took place during the First World War, when many Senegalese worked in France as infantrymen (“tirailleurs” in French) (Guèye 2002: 284; Robinson 1991: 166). After Senegal gained independence from France in 1960, an increasing number of Senegalese left for France and settled in Paris and the main industrial centres such as Marseille. These migrants are mainly Soninké, Sereer and Tukulëë (Timera 1996) who lived primarily in the Senegal River valley regions. They were attracted by the European economic boom, and their out-migration was mainly supported by their families and facilitated by the fact that all Senegalese citizens at the time had both Senegalese and French citizenship. This structural affiliation to France continued for more than 20 years after Senegal’s independence (Garson 1992: 84–85). The out-migration of Senegalese citizens to France increased from 5,688 in 1968 to 32,350 in 1982 (INSEE 2004). Growing mass migration was also a response to the persistent drought as well as economic and politicalpressure on Senegal from the international community. For example, one of the major economic problems with deep social repercussions was the devaluation of the Franc CFA in 1994, which precipitated a harsh social crisis, particularly in the cities. The devaluation halved purchasing power, and resulted in price increases of 25–30 per cent for basic food stuffs such as rice. The high price of food had far-reaching effects on all social classes (Sane 1998; Vengroff and Creevey 1997). Thus, the deep economic and social crisis Senegal was facing induced more and more Senegalese from all social strata and ethnic and religious groups to migrate. Internally migrants went to the capital city Dakar; internationally, destinations included not only to France, but also new countries, such as Spain, Italy, Germany and beyond Europe to the USA, thereby shaping a new transnational space (see Guèye 2002, 2003; Robin 1997; Tall 2002).


More Jettinger )

Unfortunately for these emigrants, as noted elsewhere, the closing down of liberal immigration regimes in most of Europe has encouraged desperate Senegalese to take the tremendous risks of illegal migration via the rickety boats of Elinkine and other Senegalese ports in order to secure a living wage for themselves and their dependents.
(Leave a comment)

Thursday, February 28th, 2008

[BRIEF NOTE] Les chinois sont à Brest, c'est trop tard.

Back in 2005, I was taken by a passage in John Lukacs's 1992 The End of the Twentieth Century and the End of the Modern Age.

In 1943, Louis-Ferdinand Céline wrote that the German army at the Volga was the last bulwark of Europe; after that the deluge, les Chinois à Brest. He meant not Brest-Litovsk on the Polish-Russian frontier but Brest at the westernmost tip of Brittany, of Europe. He lamented that the Germans lost the battle at Stalingrad and that their retreat westward then began (45-46).


As the various commenters noted, Céline was simply counting Russians as "Asians," perhaps as part of a general prejudice against Slavs, perhaps because he was imaginging something like Huntington's clash of civilizations. A pity, I suppose: I really liked the soc.history.what-if suggestion of Rich Rostrom that Céline's words, literally understood, could best realized by a Yuan Shikai with "the character and abilities of Mustafa Kemal or maybe Lee Kuan Yew or both and the useful elements of Chiang Kai-shek" who not only founds an energetic new state but modernizes with a vengeance. (Literally "modernizes with a vengeance," actually.)

But what's going on now? Not only has Brest become the twin city of China's Qingdao, but back in 2004 the French navy welcomed a Chinese flotilla around the destroyer Shenzhen led by the commander-in-chief of the East Sea Fleet. This all is part of a grimmer picture, as not only do up to a half-million people of Chinese background live in France, but many of these people are daring to become politically active. The French tourist industry is even starting to depend on the arrival of Chinese.

Céline would weep.
(5 comments | Leave a comment)

Thursday, February 7th, 2008

[FISKING] A brief look at Mitt Romney

I was so struck by the BBC report of the content of Mitt Romney's concession speech, delivered topday at the Conservative Political Action Conference, that I Googled the Associated Press-sanctioned speech transcript. It's interesting. After saying that "unless America changes course, we could become the France of the 21st century," he goes on to talk about Europe and population.

Europe -- Europe is facing a demographic disaster.

ROMNEY: That's the inevitable product of weakened faith in the Creator, failed families, disrespect for the sanctity of human life, and eroded morality.

Some reason that culture is merely an accessory to America's vitality. We know that it's the source of our strength. And we will not be dissuaded by the snickers and knowing glances when we stand up for family values and morality and culture. We will...

(APPLAUSE)

Conservatives here and conservatives across the country will always be honored to stand on principle and to stand for principles.


1. The casual slam at France is unsurprising. It's equally unsurprising that a politically unified and internally integrated demi-continent of three hundred million people that has been spared the direct ravages of war could be more powerful than a country with a fifth the population and less than a tenth of the land area. Oh well. Maybe Romney's just bitter that he made two converts during his two-and-a-half years in France as a Mormon missionary.

2. The "China and India will dominate us" meme is amusing, given the United States' aforementioned size, its very significant economic lead in per capita terms over those two countries, and the meme's tacit assumption that economic growth in these two countries will continue in the high single digits for the next two decades. If. Anyway, all this assumes that anything can break the unstoppable dominance of the Japanese.

3. It's really annoying how so many conservatives have felt free to take the word "family" and limit it to only the sorts of families that they want. In any case, to the extent that there are demographic issues in Europe, countries like Italy where traditional families are strong aren't faring nearly as well as countries like France where, at latest report, 43% of children are born out of wedlock.

I could go into more detail, but I won't bother. Why should I devote more time to political losers if I have better things to do?
(16 comments | Leave a comment)

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008

[LINK] "French Muslims becoming more observant"

From Reuters, Tom Heneghan's article "French Muslims becoming more observant".

France's Muslim minority, the largest in Europe, is becoming increasingly more observant, with more of them saying daily prayers, visiting mosques and fasting during Ramadan, a new survey said on Thursday.

This appeared to reflect in part a reaction to discrimination against Muslims in France, and a growing number of new mosques being built in the country.

Thirty-nine percent of Muslims surveyed by the polling group IFOP said they observed Islam's five prayers daily, a steady rise from 31 percent in 1994, according to the study published in the Catholic daily La Croix.

Mosque attendance for Friday prayers has risen to 23 percent, up from 16 percent in 1994, while Ramadan observance has reached 70 percent compared to 60 percent in 1994, it said.

Drinking alcohol, which Islam forbids, has also declined to 34 percent from 39 percent in 1994, according to the survey of 537 people of Muslim origin.

There was strong progression among Muslims under 25 for both mosque attendance and Ramadan observance. "There is a general tendency among the young to reaffirm their (Islamic) identity," Islam expert Franck Fregosi told La Croix.

He said this was partly a reaction to discrimination against France's Muslim minority, at five million the largest in Europe: "This 'Islam as a refuge' can be a way to respond to an environment that is not favorable to young Muslims."


It's worth noting that despite this, overall levels of irreligiosity are fairly high: "Fifty-seven percent of Catholics polled and 38 percent of Muslims called themselves 'non-practicing believers'." Fregosi goes on to say that this will represent a generational shift, as young French-born Muslims confront the first-generation immigrant leaders of the Muslim faith in France. Ramadan fasting, interestingly, seems to be a popular marker of Muslim identity.
(2 comments | Leave a comment)

Thursday, January 10th, 2008

[BRIEF NOTE] Sarkozy and Bruni in India

The status of the new relationship of the ambitious French president Nicolas Sarkozy with Franco-Italian supermodel, singer and frequent travelling companion Carla Bruni has created some uncertainty as to how Bruni fits into diplomatic protocol. In Saudi Arabia, Bruni was asked not to come. AFP reports that India's government will treat Bruni as France's First Lady, but Siddharth Srivastava at Asia Times ("For India, Sarkozy's significantly 'other'") suggested that the public attention paid to a Sarkozy-Bruni visit might complicate things significantly.

Until Bruni became public, Indian analysts were discussing the French president's visit in terms of drier issues, such as India's cancellation of the recent multi-million dollar Eurocopter helicopter deal due to supposed US pressure and a controversy over French Scorpene submarines.

Yet, the visit of a French president never attracts the kind of frenzy or attention that accompanies a US presidential visit or the interest that a Russian or Chinese head of state can create.

Sarkozy, with the comely Bruni, however, tilts the balance and has already evoked the expected response from tabloids and the increasingly aggressive Indian paparazzi that feed the very competitive TV channels. Sarkozy's pictures with his pretty companion during recent travels to Egypt have been given prominent display.

[. . .]

However, Bruni and Sarkozy will perhaps need to watch out for the rising numbers of hyperactive, hypersensitive radical elements referred to as the "moral police" who love to pick on celebrities, especially film and sports stars, usually on charges of indecent portrayal of women, hurting religious sentiments and - a more recent concern - "disrespecting the national flag".


Srivastava cited as an example of this the kiss between Richard Gere and Shilpa Shetty that sparked public outrage in some segments of Indian public opinion.
(3 comments | Leave a comment)

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

[LINK] "Language barriers can be higher than they seem"

Peter Gill's article in The Telegraph, "Language barriers can be higher than they seem", provides an amusing perspective on the language difficulties he encountered when he, like so many other Britons, moved to France to make a new home in old province of Béarn, located in the east of the modern department of Pyrénées-Atlantiques.

Although we knew the area we were moving to, we hadn't taken on board its linguistic complexity. If I look out of the window now I can see areas where four distinct languages are spoken.

Our house is on the northern boundary of the old kingdom of Béarn and the view is across the lovely Béarnaise countryside to the Pyrenees on the skyline. Now Béarn is part of France and its official language is French although that is a recent phenomenon.

Many of our older friends in the area only started to learn French when they went to school and their parents' generation never spoke it at all. But also we can see the (Spanish) Pyrenees - another language which is the main means of communication in a number of the mountain passes on the French side of the border.


All said, four languages--Basque, the local Gascon variant of Occitan, Spanish, and a local French heavily marked by Gascon influences that was quite distinct from the French that he and his wife had learned--were present in his new home. (Happily, Gill managed to pick up that last language. Eventually.)
(Leave a comment)

Tuesday, August 28th, 2007

[BLOG-LIKE POSTING] Belgian divorces and remarriages

Though Brussels Journal seems to be a far-right wing site devoted equally to particularly reactionary brands of Flemish nationalism and the fight against Eurabia, on its front page is a link to an interesting article in Le Figaro, Alexandre Adler's "La Belgique va-t-elle demander le divorce ?" ("Will Belgium ask for a divorce?"). In this article, Adler argues that Belgium is doomed to split up and thaqt it would be to France's benefit to support the split.

La réalité, c'est que la société flamande, cette petite Bavière maritime, est en proie à un dynamisme économique et social remarquable, ayant réussi sa mutation linguistique, et dispose d'une population exactement équivalente à celles du Danemark ou de la Norvège. Méfiante à l'égard de la Hollande voisine, la Flandre indépendante serait en fait, assez vite, le plus francophile et le plus latin des États germaniques de l'Europe du Nord. Le dogme de la diplomatie française consistant à tout faire pour maintenir la Flandre en Belgique doit donc être révisé d'autant plus vite et radicalement qu'en prenant en main la revendication nationale, les chrétiens sociaux et leurs alliés libéraux et socialistes ont fait reculer l'extrême droite locale aussi efficacement que Sarkozy, en France.

The reality is that the society of Flanders, this small maritime Bavaria, enjoys a remarkable economic and social dynamism, having succeeded with its language issue, and has a population just as large as those of Denmark or Norway. Being wary with regard to neighbouring Holland, the independent Flanders would in fact rather quickly become the most francophile and Latin of the Germanic states of northern Europe. The dogma of French diplomacy that Flanders must be kept in Belgium thus should be revised, all the more quickly and radically since by creating an independent Flanders, the by taking in hand the national claim, the Christian Democrats and their liberal and socialist allies would push back the extreme right just as effectively as Sarkozy in France.


More, Adler--described on his Wikipedia as someone quite close to American neoconservatives, for whatever it's worth--argues that France should take advantage of Belgium's dissolution to embrace the ideology of rattachisme and to annex Wallonia, making that province France's 23rd region and adding presumably another four or five departments to the republic. Again, my translation follows Adler's original French.

Mais voilà, les Wallons et les Bruxellois n'auront aucune envie de former un État croupion symétrique. Comme chacun devrait le savoir, c'est le 14 Juillet que l'on fête à Liège, c'est à Paris que l'on a sacré Michaux, Marguerite Yourcenar, Simenon et même le prix Nobel de littérature belge, Maurice Maeterlinck, qui jugeait sa langue natale flamande impropre à la littérature. En se choisissant une non-capitale à Namur, en intitulant sa représentation à Paris « communauté française » et non « communauté francophone », nos compatriotes d'outre-Quiévrain nous ont déjà tout dit. Comme Helmut Kohl en 1990, Nicolas Sarkozy a donc toutes les chances de devoir gouverner une France plus grande, un peu appauvrie par la crise industrielle chronique de ses nouvelles régions irrédentistes, et un Parti socialiste certes écrêté de ses élites les plus parisiennes, mais recentré sur la vieille base populaire du Borinage et de la vallée de la Meuse, pour ne pas parler des bobos bruxellois qui valent bien les nôtres.

But the Walloons and the Bruxellois will not want to form a symmetrical rump state tail. As everyone should know, July 14th is the holiday of Liège, and it is in Paris that literature crowned Michaux, Marguerite Yourcenar, Simenon and even the Nobel Prize-winner of Belgian literature, Maurice Maeterlinck, who considered his native Flemish language unsuitable for literature. By choosing a not-capital with Namur, by entitling its representation in Paris "French community" and not "French-speaking community", our compatriots on the other side of the Quiévrain said it all. Like Helmut Kohl in 1990, Nicolas Sarkozy has every chance to control a larger France, a bit impoverished by the chronic industrial crisis of his new redeemed areas, while a Socialist Party that has recently chopped off its Parisian elites could recenter on the old popular base of coal-mining and the valley of the Meuse, not to mention the sores of Brussels which are ours as well.


Now, it's quite true that Wallonia is a region heavily influenced by France--I wrote back in September 2005 about the grim fate of Walloon, the local speech marginalized by a decidedly Francophone state--and that an annexation of Wallonia might seem plausible, and might even be welcomed by the French public at large--certainly De Gaulle favoured Wallonia's annexation, the comments by French readers of this blog seem generally supportive, and I know that at least some people have imagined Wallonia's annexation to be partial compensation for German reunification. Similarly, it's worth noting the results of a recent poll which suggest that two-thirds of the Dutch support would support unification with Flanders, creating a sort of Greater Netherlands.

That said, these plans for expansion all require the consent of the populations of Flanders and Wallonia and Brussels. In Wallonia, the pro-annexation Rassemblement Wallonie France received barely more than 1% of the votes in the just-completed 2007 elections, even though the RWF is a direct descendant of a major Walloon regionalist party. In Flanders, the nationalist Vlaams Belang that might yet break up Flanders favours "cooperat[ing] as closely as possible with the Netherlands and with Southern Flanders (the Dutch-speaking municipalities in the North of France)", not annexation into the Kingdom of the Netherlands, and I'm not aware of any Flemish political party that favours Flanders' annexation. Belgium might not survive, I don't know, but I think it's best for France and Netherlands might just have to accept that they aren't at all likely to have a common frontier in Brabant. It's not that France and the Netherlands aren't nice countries, it's just that the Flemish and Walloons and Bruxellois don't want to become French or Dutch.
(6 comments | Leave a comment)

Friday, May 11th, 2007

[LINK] A Friday tour of the blogosphere


  • Otto Spijkers at 1948 explores the way in which the candidates in the recent Fnench election used the terms "globalisation" and "mondialisation" in ways that suggested that these two words weren't synonyms of the same phenomenon.

  • Alpha Sources' Claus Vistesen links to a contrarian analysis of his about the French economy, arguing that compared to many of its Eurozone neighbours France has what is in fact a relatively strong economy with good fundamentals.

  • Aziz Poonwalla at City of Brass links to and comments upon an interesting article regarding conversions to Shi'ite Islam in Sunni-majority Syria.

  • Joe.My.God touches upon the fallout of the failed relationship of Lord Browne (formerly of British Petroleum) and Canadian Jeff Chevalier, the whole sad story demonstrating that adequate amounts of palimony and a clean breakup are good things to have in a failing relationship regardless of sexual orientation.

  • Bert Archer wonders why the press has such an adversarial relationship with authorities, arguably more so than in the not-too-distant past.
  • Diane Duane reviews one of her favourite cafe/restaurants, Le Cirio in Brussels.

  • Otto Pohl commemorates the 63rd anniversary of the beginning of the Soviet ethnic cleansing of the Crimean Tatars from their homeland.

  • Edward Lucas' blog and Peteris Cedrins' Marginalia both have extensive, accurate coverage of the recent controversy surrounding Estonia's removal of the Bronze Soldier of Tallinn from its former position of prominence in the Estonian capital.

  • [info]feorag at the Pagan Prattle links to news reports of a Satanic-conspiracy mania in an Italian kindergarten, twenty years after the North American wave.

(5 comments | Leave a comment)

Tuesday, April 24th, 2007

[BRIEF NOTE] Ah, Ségo?

Last night, I was surprised to see [info]imomus come out for French presidential candidate Ségolène Royal, not so much because of his support for the Socialist candidate in the 2007 French presidential election as because the post "Votez Cérès, déesse de l'agriculture, des moissons et de la fécondité!" ("Vote for Ceres, goddess of agriculture, harvests, and fertility") was most atypically written in French but, ah, bilingualism and its many benefits.

[info]imomus' post is substantially facetious--an essay referencing the Wickerman and promising that, if Royal was elected, France would "not only benefit sexually, but would have harvests that would make even José Bové green with jealousy," has to be, at least in part--but the author does make the good point that a President Royal would be a major shft, the first Socialist President in a decade since the death of François Mitterand and the first woman president of France ever.

Royal has frequently been identified with the French Republican personification of Marianne, a personnage, obviously because of her gender, perhaps also in part because her candidacy came about as a result of a challenge to the Socialist Party leadership

Why is it a woman and not a man who represents the Republic? To start with, Liberté and République are both feminine nouns in the French language. One could also find the answer to this question in the traditions and mentality of the French, suggests the historian Maurice Agulhon, who in several well-known works set out on a detailed investigation to discover the origins of Marianne. A feminine allegory was also a manner to symbolise the breaking with the monarchical regime headed by men. Note also that even before the French Revolution, France or the Kingdom of France were embodied in masculine figures, as depicted in certain ceilings of Palace of Versailles.


"When Ségolène-Ceres-Demeter is elected," [info]imomus concludes, "then--with the help of Zeus--we'll cook those pigs Le Pen and Sarkozy in a great sacrificial fire. He who sows the wind ..." That last is an interesting image, although I don't think that Nicolas Sarkozy is of a piece with Le Pen, not even with his past doubtful statements regarding rioters in the banlieues. A President Royal would outrage American conservatives.

Royal continues to snipe from the sidelines about Operation Iraqi Freedom and advocates America's withdrawal from Iraq. She believes that decisions about Iraq's transition should be made solely by the Iraqi government, barely concealing her implicit criticism of American involvement in the region. During her keynote manifesto speech outlining her presidential platform, she not only acknowledged the divisions caused by France's vocal opposition to the war in Iraq, but even pledged to speak "louder and stronger."

She has also made diplomatically crass comments about President Bush. "I do not mix up Bush's America with the American people," she has said. "The American people are our friends."


Alas for Royal, A Fistful of Euros' assessment is likely correct in predicting her eventual defeat. Her 25% showing is smaller than Sarkozy's 30%, and although François Bayrou managed to carry only his native department of Pyrénées-Atlantiques his support base is more likely to lean towards Sarkozy than towards Royal. At least she managed to galvanize the Socialist Party and, who knows, maybe she might manage to follow Mitterand's precedent and come back in his second time. In the meantime, Sarkozy's economic policies seem to be somewhat more likely to deal with the problems of the French economy--relatively dynamic by western European standards, but still performing below par with a high rate of unemployment that does much to threaten the very substantial cultural integration of France's immigrant minorities, Muslim included, that has already taken place. Ségo in 2011?
(Leave a comment)

Thursday, August 24th, 2006

[LINK] "Europe: Study Shows France Leading In Muslim Integration"

From Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

More than half of French Muslims are concerned about joblessness, according to survey data collected by Pew in April 2006. But unlike their coreligionists elsewhere, a substantial majority embraces the customs of their countrymen.

"Nearly eight in 10 French Muslims generally say they want to adopt French customs," Allen said. "And this high preference for assimilation certainly compares with that in Spain, although Spanish Muslims tend also to come from North Africa. Only 53 percent of Muslims in Spain say they want to adopt Spanish customs. Only 41 percent in Britain say the same about British customs. And nearly 30 percent in Germany say that. So you can see that in some sense the Muslims in France feel more at home in that country."

As with the Paris riots last fall, the arrests of British-born Muslims in London in connection with an alleged plot to blow up airliners have prompted speculation that ethnic discrimination and joblessness have made Islamic extremism attractive to British Muslims. But French Muslims also face unemployment and prejudice. In fact, 37 percent of French Muslims reported a bad experience due to their race, ethnicity, or religion, compared to 28 percent among British Muslims.

Yet, the worldviews of French and British Muslims are worlds apart, according to Allen.

"When you ask questions about things like [potential] Iranian nuclear weapons -- this is a very striking finding," Allen said. "When we asked whether they favored or opposed Iran acquiring nuclear weapons, fully 71 percent of French Muslims opposed it, whereas only 41 percent of British Muslims opposed it. You just sort of see a different worldview operating there. I think it is partly French culture, and it is also partly the culture that their family lived in North Africa, too, in a more secularized outlook and a feeling that religion can be separated from the state."
(5 comments | Leave a comment)

Sunday, July 9th, 2006

[BRIEF NOTE] Why aren't there Little Frances in Canada?

The World Cup finished today, with an Italian victory over France. I knew that there was an Italian victory, owing in large part to the processions of honking cars with passengers (even dirvers) who waved Italian flags out of windows. I can only imagine what things were like in Little Italy; frankly, I'm thankful that I didn't have to pass through there this afternoon. I have to admit, too, to a certain mild pleasure at the fact that the final wasn't an Italy-Portugal game, especially since the growing Portuguese neighbourhood downtown borders upon Little Italy. The potential for riots is obvious ("Hold the Lusitanians at Christie!").

There isn't a French neighbourhood, though. As Wayne Scanlan recently observed in the Ottawa Citizen (Wanted: Some French expats to share in the fun"), there tend not to be ethnically French neighbourhoods in any Canadian cities.

As one Toronto reporter put it, this was the "safer" World Cup final.

The one with France involved.

Italy vs. Portugal?

"It would have been a war zone," one fan said.

Chaos on the streets.

Little Italy vs. Little Portugal.

Adding up to big tension in the Big Smoke.

Italy vs. France?

Not so much.

In fact, where are the French?

In France, mostly.

Here in Ottawa, there is no Preston Street equivalent for expatriates, fervent followers of Les Bleus. Just pockets of activity to hint at the fire and passion back home on the streets of Paris.

The simple truth is that there aren't enough French expats in Ottawa to create much of a stir (that's not meant as a challenge, mes amis).

[. . .]

[French embassy staff member Olivier] Roy estimates there are at least 1,000 expats in this region. Nation-wide, about 100,000 former French nationals live in Canada, half of them in Montreal.

"Unlike other countries in Europe, France has been a place of immigration, not emigration," Roy said.

"There have been no diseases, no dictatorships," Roy said. "During World War II, France was invaded by the Germans. Otherwise, it has not been hard to live there."

Or to visit.

Vineyards, cheese, two mountain ranges and a place on the Riviera. What's not to like, except the occasional abrupt waiter?

In an essay distributed by the French embassy in 2005, sociologist Emmanuel Peignard wrote that France has had a tradition of immigration dating back 150 years, as a means of combatting declining birth rates and an aging population.


As the intelligently revised but once controversial Wikipedia article on the French people should make reasonably clear, the Québécois and other Canadian Francophones do not identify themselves as French. The last time that Canada was a French territory, after all, an uninterrupted line of Bourbon kings ruled France and its dominions. The immigrant communities that they founded in New England in the late 19th centuries were called little Canadas for a reason.
(6 comments | Leave a comment)

Saturday, May 13th, 2006

[MUSIC] Variété in Boston

In the Boston Phoenix, Michael Freedberg examines French popular music, specifically variété ("Ils ne regrettent rien"), taking a look at musicians like Mylène Farmer, Zazie, Carla Bruni and others. I like them, for whatever it's worth.
(Leave a comment)

Friday, May 5th, 2006

[DM] "Does the Canadian example work for France?"

Over at Demography Matters, I speculate whether Canada's immigrant policy would work in France. I come to the preliminary conclusion that it won't, not unless more things change in France.
(Leave a comment)

[BRIEF NOTE] Plus ça change

Radio Polonia reports the interesting news that that, in parts of France like the département of Nord where the million or so French of Polish origin are concentrated, French of Polish origin play a prominent role in the organization of the far-right Front national.

The French National Front party has a firm stance against immigrants and a solid "Frenchmen first"-policy. But in some regions, for instance in the Nord department bordering Belgium, one third of the members are of Polish origin. When asked about this state of affairs by the Polish press, National Front senior ideologist Bruno Gollnisch saw nothing strange in this. He said the Polish immigrants, who arrived in the 1940 or earlier, were hard-working and loyal to their new homeland. Dominique Slabolepszy, a National Front representative from the Nord-Pays de Calais-region and son of a Polish immigrant, said to the Polish daily newspaper Rzeczpospolita that he joined the Front 20 years ago. His family had been supporters of President Charles De Gaulle's party, but he believed that its ideas had been betrayed by its subsequent leaders, such as Jacques Chirac, the current president of France.


The Radio Polonia report goes on to suggest that the insecurity prevailing throughout French society is responsible for this mildly amusing result. My sense of amusement is only heightened by the fact that, as as Janine Ponty noted in 1998, in the 1920s and 1930s Polish immigrants were widely identified as unassimilable proletarians, of foreign Slavic origin and with an antiquated Roman Catholicism, and subjected to mass deportations. Juan Cole touches upon this in a Novmeber 2005 essay on the French riots, pointing out the very strong parallels between the Poles (and other métèques) then and the Maghrebins now, as I did two years ago in "France, its Muslims, and the Future". Tony McNeill's indispensable lectures on French immigration provide further background on the highly politicized context and representation of immigration in France for the past century and a half.

I wonder if, in a half-century or two, the Front national or its descendants will claim members of Maghrebin descent. "Yes, our parents and grandparents had problems, but those were transitory. These Congolese and Central Americans, now, know nothing of our culture and history! They're taking over ..."
(3 comments | Leave a comment)

Sunday, April 30th, 2006

[REVIEW] Jean-Paul Kauffmann, The Arch of Kerguelen

French journalist Jean-Paul Kauffmann's 1993 The Arch of Kerguelen, originally published in 1993 by Flammarion of Paris and translated by Patricia Clancy for a 2000 publication by Four Walls Eight Windows, might be the only books I've ever read on the Kerguelen Islands. Even so, I can say with certainty that The Arch of Kerguelen easily sets the standard for all future books, and for all like books.

The Kerguelen Islands, a volcanic archipelago in the Southern Ocean roughly equidistant from South Africa and Australia, were discovered in 1772 by the luckless French explorer Yves Joseph de Kerguelen de Trémarec, eventually included in the Fifth Republic's French Southern and Antarctic Lands. There have been, as Kauffmann enumerates, innumerable plans to humanize the islands, starting with discussion in the salons of pre-Revolutionary Paris on settling dozens of luckless Acadian families in this open land. In the past century, in fact, there has been a more-or-less sustained human presence on the islands for most of the past century: Whaling ships have called at the islands' harbours, people like the Bossière brothers of Normandy have tried to establish human colonies, imported rabbits and sheep have wrought havoc on native vegetation like the Kerguelen cabbage. To the author's surprise, sheep herds and aquacultured salmon and whaling harbours can now be found on these the most isolated of islands.

No humans live there permanently, though, and none will. After several tries, the islands' only human residents are scientists and researchers and support staff, rotated in and out. The Arch of Kerguelen of the title was sighted by Cook soon after the islands' discovery, a great arch tens of metres high that seemed to welcome visitors to an interior notable now for being a void. Here, cartographers may impose names on the blanks in the islands' maps while scientific researchers may here come to perform their delicate experiments, but no one stays, apart from those unfortunately buried in the graves at Port aux Français. Appropriately enough, the great modernizing dream of the Enlightenment, the belief of the philosophes in the flexibility of human beings, broke on the shores of the islands discovered in the Enlightenment's last days. Kauffmann succeeds wonderfully in demonstrating, in a lucid prose style that survived translation, that the land's apparent openness comes not from its openness to humanity but rather because it's structurally irrelevant and unsuitable to humanity, because it is--in his word--"ahuman."
(4 comments | Leave a comment)

Sunday, March 19th, 2006

[REVIEW] The Pink and the Black

Frédéric Martel's The Pink and the Black: Homosexuals in France Since 1968, translated and puiblished in the English language in 1999, is a decidedly interesting read. In his study of French GLBT communities--particularly the male ones--Martel examines in detail a fascinating history, from slowly fading repression in the 1960s to openness in new ghettos in the 1970s, and then from the mass death and emergent communial organization associated with HIV/AIDS in the 1980s to mainstreaming and normalization in the 1990s. There are some uniquely French peculiarities in Martel's story, which he does choose to begin in the immediate aftermath of the abortive revolution of May 1968, which inspired emergent activists like Guy Hocquenghem to embrace radical left-wing politics despite the homophobic hostility that was sadly typical of the Western Left in that time frame. Similarly, the PACS--the Pacte civil de solidarité, France's civil unions--takes on a greater importance and earlier in France than the same-sex marriage debate did in Canada.

By and large, the trajectory that The Pink and the Black describes is something that I recognized from my readings of Canadian GLBT history. This is why Martel's emphasis on the difference between the French and American models of minority assimilation, in his epilogue, was somewhat confusing. Briefly put, the French model of integration assimilates individuals but refuses to recognize group identities, stemming perhaps from what Noiriel described in The French Melting Pot as the relative prominence of the state in integration and the numerous problems facing the recognition of group rights in a liberal democratic societies. The American model, in contrast, is positioned as a model that allows for the existence of numerous intermediate groups which take on relatively unofficial positions as intermediaries. (This difference is something examined in this 2000 review in the Canadian Journal of Sociology and in this review at Gay Today, incidentally.) Martel argues that, if not for HIV/AIDS, the French model would have prevailed, that it was only the stigmatization of (male) GLBT individuals in France that led to the emergence of of American-style identities and groups like Act Up-Paris, perhaps the most active branch of ACT-UP. The bankruptcy of the American model, according to Martel, can be found in the almost universal refusal of GLBT community leaders and institutions--business owners, media people, journals, associations of professionals--to react to the first warnings that a new disease called GRID had appeared.

Martel's point might possibly be true; certainly Shilts documented much the same sort of communal paralysis in the United States. But yet, did the French state do that much better a job of confronting HIV/AIDS than the American? Rates of seropositivity in France in the early 21st century might be half those of the United States, but is that because the French state was more capable or because the HIV virus was introduced to France at a later date? Martel doesn't examine this critical issue. He should have; it would have made the conclusion less tendentious. Similarly, the inevitability of the ghetto as at least a central meeting point for a minority population that is composed, by nature, of dispersed individuals who need to be socialized is soemthing Martel doesn't touch upon. That said, this epilogue is a minor point in an otherwise compelling history that has already become the standard work in its field.
(Leave a comment)

Thursday, March 9th, 2006

[LINK] "France's immigration myths"

Patrice de Beer's essay at Open Democracy, "France's immigration myths", merits reading and not only because of its identification of a profoundly important bias in public discourse on immigration.

In 1999, 23% (13.5 million out of 59 million) of the population were of immigrant origin – 4.3 million were migrants themselves, 5.5 million were children of immigrants, and 3.6 million were grandchildren. Of these, 22% were connected to north Africa, 5% to sub-Saharan Africa, and 53% to other European countries (mostly Italian, Spaniards, Portuguese and Poles, who also took decades to integrate). To understand the complexity of this situation, a reader might try to imagine what such percentages could mean for his or her own society.

In targeting only "coloured" and Muslim immigrants – less than 30% of the total – some French politicians seem to be playing with fire. Moreover, they run the risk of alienating former French (and francophone) Africa where France's influence has been paramount since it reached independence in the 1960s. The magazine L'Evènement (Burkina Faso) recently quoted the late Ivory Coast president, and former member of the French government, Felix Houphouët-Boigny, who once said: "I waited for the bride in front of the church with flowers in my hands but she didn't come. And my flowers have wilted". The magazine added a comment on Jacques Chirac's last visit to Africa: that, if France couldn't come out with a new and more sensible African strategy, she "could miss her second rendezvous with the Africans. And, this time, it could mean divorce."
(4 comments | Leave a comment)
Previous 20