November 24th, 2010

[BLOG] Some Wednesday links


  • Acts of Minor treason's Andrew Barton argues that the idea of using transhumanism to solve problems overlooks the fact that normal people created these and can deal with these issues, suggesting also it relates to a certain effort at self-determination in a grey Geselleschaft world.

  • Daniel Drezner makes the point that saying American students are distracted by information technologies unlike their more studious counterparts in East Asia overlooks interesting--and well-known--patterns of, um, everything related to Internet and technology usage in that area.

  • Leading a negotiations scenario, Lawyers, Guns and Money's Robert Farley describes how a simulated set of negotiations over Nagorno-Karabakh, no matter what outside powers agreed, failed because of the entrenched hostilities of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Nagorno-Karabakh.

  • At The Long Game, Matt Warren describes how Stratfor founder George Friedman is traveling central and eastern Europe, claiming inspiration from the people he meets for his futurological predictions.

  • Slap Upside the Head mocks Michael Coren, a Canadian talking head, who doesn't think much of "It Gets Better" or queer people generally.

  • Tim Gueguen points out that whatever Canadians might think of the monarchy now, reopening the constitutional debates of the past is so unappealing that the monarchy is likely to stay.

  • Torontoist reproduces the first ads for the World's Biggest Bookstore, Toronto's biggest bookstore just north of Yonge and Dundas. I'm surprised that people at the time thought it brash.

[LINK] "Artificial Rivers"

In a recent post, Landscape+Urbanism discussed how urban planners in London and especially Boston used landscaping--in Boston's case, land reclamation--as an integral method of urban planning. In Boston's case, the effort was apparently quite successful: "While it is easy to consider this an 'extension of nature' it is clear this is a constructed urban landscape, and that after time it is hard to see this historical ecology without some digging - as it is perceived as nature."

Go, read. I can't do justice to the maps and pictures of links here, so, go read the original.

[LINK] "Note to Canadian authors: Stop tweeting, start writing!"

I like Russell Smith: nice writer, fellow Queen's alumnus, snappy dresser. Is this good advice? Should I take it?

In these dark times for publishing, one consistent piece of advice goes around for writers: You have to learn to be your own marketer and advertiser. You have to try to build up some kind of Web following by blogging or tweeting, preferably both; you have to find the people with the interests that your book will appeal to; you have to “tap into a community;” you have to spend half your time on this rather than on writing, and if you don’t you’re naive, you’ve got your head in the clouds: You think the world is just going to come to you?

And if you do promote yourself, goes the current wisdom, then your book will develop a cult following and sell tens of thousands of copies because people will so enjoy your tweets they will rush out and buy your book. (Actually I am guessing about that part; the mechanics of the actual book-buying decision have not yet been explained by the self-promotion gurus.)

[. . .]

I am going to recommend here exactly the opposite. That writers stop wasting their time on self-promotion because it has not been proven to make any difference whatsoever to one’s sales.

In this country, anyway, bestsellers are generally chosen by prize juries and they are just as likely to be obscure, unpromoted and written by isolated people without Twitter accounts as by technophilic extroverts. A couple of examples: The Sentimentalist, winner of the 2010 Giller Prize, and Cool Water, winner of the 2010 Governor-General’s Award.

These books are going to be bestsellers without any self-promotion on the part of their authors – indeed, most people, even book people, had not heard of the novels before the announcements. They are both books that might be called “small” books by publishers looking for blockbuster high-concept stories; that is, they are personal stories in unglamorous settings. There were no campaigns waged by the authors to attain this massive publicity. Indeed, these particular authors seem to be stereotypically introverted. The books are chosen to be bestsellers by juries appointed by other juries.

[. . .]

Here’s some better advice if you want to get famous in Canada: Instead of tweeting, finish your novel. Make it as good as you can. Do this by reading a lot of other great novels. Make sure your publisher submits it to the Giller Prize. Then wait. There is absolutely nothing else you can do to make a difference.


Thoughts?